The role and the place of the morphology component in language faculty is 
still a point of debate in linguistics. The bracketing mismatches in 
syntax and morphology and the phrasal scope of morphemes provide evidence 
for the existence of a problem for morphology and semantics. In fact, the 
mitmatches in sytax and morphology have semantic basis, which is largely 
ignored in studies of inflectional morphology. A possible solution to this 
problem is proposed by Bozsahin(2002a), which provides a purely morphemic 
lexicon and a CCG parser, that constructs syntactic constituents in parallel 
to semantic interpretations. However, the lack of a mechanism to handle 
morphotactics and morphophonemics not only puts a burden on lexicon by 
having all allomorphs of the same morpheme as separate lexical entries, 
but also prevents the ambiguity which must be preserved until interpretation. 
In this study, a morphological analyzer which provides the morphemic parser 
with a stream of morphemes together with their morphosyntactic and semantic 
categories is presented. The objective is to compare the three different 
architectures of lexicon-morphology-syntax interface (Bozsahin, 2002a). 
As a consequence, a modular system is proposed, and the coverage of the 
combinatory morphemic lexicon on transparent correspondence of morphosyntax 
and semantics is maintained.

Keywords: NLP, morphosyntax, morphology, lexicon, CCG, 
computational linguistics